<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cigar Review: Alec Bradley Harvest Selection 1997</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.toastedfoot.com/2010/02/cigar-review-alec-bradley-harvest-selection-1997/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.toastedfoot.com/2010/02/cigar-review-alec-bradley-harvest-selection-1997/</link>
	<description>Reviews, News, &#38; Interviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2012 20:10:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ROTHNH</title>
		<link>http://www.toastedfoot.com/2010/02/cigar-review-alec-bradley-harvest-selection-1997/comment-page-1/#comment-2377</link>
		<dc:creator>ROTHNH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 17:00:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.toastedfoot.com/?p=1434#comment-2377</guid>
		<description>Some time ago, I purchased a box of the largest size (6X54) for well under $50 (CI sells these for $70/box).   While this cigar is a solid medium in all respects, it is not at all complex, delivering it&#039;s pleasant smoking qualities, without bite or bitterness,  from first puff to nub.  All the cigars in my box were well made, firm without soft spots with no flaws.  I had absolutely no problem with the draw on all 20 cigars and the burn, while not perfectly straight , was even requiring just a touch-up or two on some sticks and, unless I let the cigar sit unattended for 10 minutes or more, relights were never required.  Friends who have purchased this brand (many at my recommendation) have voiced no complaints.   I doin&#039;t know what caused the reviewer&#039;s problem with the burn and the plugging issues, but I do not believe it to be at all typical -- I hope to God he got credit for them and I look forward to an update of this review which I do not doubt will be more in line with the excellent qualities and value of this cigar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some time ago, I purchased a box of the largest size (6X54) for well under $50 (CI sells these for $70/box).   While this cigar is a solid medium in all respects, it is not at all complex, delivering it&#8217;s pleasant smoking qualities, without bite or bitterness,  from first puff to nub.  All the cigars in my box were well made, firm without soft spots with no flaws.  I had absolutely no problem with the draw on all 20 cigars and the burn, while not perfectly straight , was even requiring just a touch-up or two on some sticks and, unless I let the cigar sit unattended for 10 minutes or more, relights were never required.  Friends who have purchased this brand (many at my recommendation) have voiced no complaints.   I doin&#8217;t know what caused the reviewer&#8217;s problem with the burn and the plugging issues, but I do not believe it to be at all typical &#8212; I hope to God he got credit for them and I look forward to an update of this review which I do not doubt will be more in line with the excellent qualities and value of this cigar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: toasted</title>
		<link>http://www.toastedfoot.com/2010/02/cigar-review-alec-bradley-harvest-selection-1997/comment-page-1/#comment-1002</link>
		<dc:creator>toasted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 00:42:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.toastedfoot.com/?p=1434#comment-1002</guid>
		<description>Well, I doubt this would be the AB to try; it&#039;s never mentioned as one of his best, though you can find them cheaply. I think I gave around $12 for a 5 pack online.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I doubt this would be the AB to try; it&#8217;s never mentioned as one of his best, though you can find them cheaply. I think I gave around $12 for a 5 pack online.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg</title>
		<link>http://www.toastedfoot.com/2010/02/cigar-review-alec-bradley-harvest-selection-1997/comment-page-1/#comment-1001</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 19:09:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.toastedfoot.com/?p=1434#comment-1001</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve never been a fan of AB&#039;s, but that&#039;s me.  I&#039;ll give one a try.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve never been a fan of AB&#8217;s, but that&#8217;s me.  I&#8217;ll give one a try.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: toasted</title>
		<link>http://www.toastedfoot.com/2010/02/cigar-review-alec-bradley-harvest-selection-1997/comment-page-1/#comment-1000</link>
		<dc:creator>toasted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 15:50:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.toastedfoot.com/?p=1434#comment-1000</guid>
		<description>Not sure that I&#039;d call it vegetal, but it definitely had a well-mixed combination of sweet and spice; it reminded me of green pepper on salad, so I guess it could border on being vegetal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not sure that I&#8217;d call it vegetal, but it definitely had a well-mixed combination of sweet and spice; it reminded me of green pepper on salad, so I guess it could border on being vegetal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dj</title>
		<link>http://www.toastedfoot.com/2010/02/cigar-review-alec-bradley-harvest-selection-1997/comment-page-1/#comment-999</link>
		<dc:creator>dj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 15:11:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.toastedfoot.com/?p=1434#comment-999</guid>
		<description>&quot;Sweet pepper?&quot; Like... vegetal?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Sweet pepper?&#8221; Like&#8230; vegetal?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

